News

David Stewart MSP #Covid “passports could be an additional longer-term strategy to quarantine”

David Stewart ,MSP Labour, has continued to press the Scottish Government on the issue of Covid Passports.

Quarantine Hotels

The Scottish Government has announced that from 15th of February all arrivals to Scotland from outside the Common Travel Area must book and pay for managed isolation in quarantine hotels. Six hotels have been selected nearby the airports at Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen. Travellers going in to the quarantine hotels will be required to pay £1750. Travellers will also be required to take at least 2 covid tests and be in quarantine for 10 days.

Michael Matheson, Transport Secretary in the Scottish Government said:

“To manage the risk of importing new variants, and to give vaccine deployment the best chance of bringing us closer to normality here in Scotland, we have to place further limits on international travel.

“The UK Government has only committed to adopting this for travellers returning from “red list” countries. However, we know that is not sufficient and we will go further.

“The clinical advice is clear that a comprehensive system of managed quarantine is essential to minimise the impact of new COVID-19 variants.”

The use of quarantine hotels is used by countries such as New Zealand and Australia very effectively. The Scottish and UK Governments were urged last year to implement a similar provision but failed to do so. The Scottish Government is now going ahead with the plan. You can find more information on that here: Coronavirus (COVID-19): international travel and quarantine

Covid Passports

David Stewart, asked Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Infrastructure and Technology, Michael Matheson, for his view on Covid Passports at the meeting of the Scottish Parliament’s Health and Sport Committee. Covid Passports are seen as a route to opening borders and returning to international travel.

David Stewart has previously raised the issue with National Clinical Director Jason Leitch and arguing its merits in Holyrood with First Minister Nicola Sturgeon – he told Michael Matheson he strongly believed Scotland and the UK risked being left behind if it did not begin to seek international co-operation for some form of digital passport which holds a traveller’s COVID-19 immunity status.

Michael Matheson was “not persuaded that it was the right approach at the present moment”. He said there were too many challenges around new variants of the virus and a lack of understanding around how the vaccine operated in the transmission stages. He also said civil liberty issues first needed to be addressed.

Afterwards David Stewart commented:

“I was grateful to the Cabinet Secretary for his response and wanted to make the wider point that these passports could be an additional longer-term strategy to quarantine. I wanted to raise it because I feel this is a massive issue which needs to get straightened out and Scotland and the UK have leadership roles to play.

“I just cannot see how international travel and our tourism industry can be built back up until an internationally-recognised passport showing people’s immunity status is brought in. Already, Europe is working at pace with this with the Greek government active. And we are already see airlines approaching this initiative which has been raised by people like our former Prime Minister Tony Blair and we’ve had it raised, albeit rather ambiguously, at UK government level.

“Obviously, it’s a longer term issue, but I believe it is going to happen. Mr Matheson and the First Minister have both said too little is known about the virus, it’s too soon for this scheme, but surely, given the scale of the pandemic and the research into COVID-19, our understanding around the nature of infection and immunity is going to rise rapidly.

“Leading scientists have said it: the clinical infection, with or without a measurement of antibody response, could form the basis of a time-limited immunity passport. What is really concerning me is the ability of government to deliver such a robust system if they are not already actively working on it.

“It does indeed raise questions around is it right that some people should be allowed greater freedoms if they have been vaccinated while those who might want the vaccination but are still waiting cannot be allowed those freedoms?

” The way I look at it is every decision we make right now is going to come with consequences but allowing people to travel as soon as they are able to will help the global economy to rebuild. And for those individuals who don’t want to be vaccinated for personal reasons, that is their democratic right and I respect that.

“But while people have the freedom to have the vaccine or not, they do not have the freedom to place others at risk because of that decision.”

1 reply »

  1. I am wondering… what’s wrong with the good old yellow booklets (international vaccination certicates) which have been in use for many decades in several counries around the globe? Each time I went for whatever vaccines, our local GP practice repeatedly was almost fascinated by this document where they had to list the vaccine used, put the little charge number sticker on (that’s the reason why there are two stickers on vaccine packages), date and sign. Such a simple way for health professionals to see what diseases a patient had received vaccines against in the past and when, whether this was the last tetanus booster, Hepatitis vaccine, Meningitis vaccine or whatever.

    Whilst it might be dodgy to issue Covid-passports to be granted any rights (simply because we cannot yet be sure whether transmission still occurs and there will always people who cannot receive a specific vaccine due to certain health conditions, who would want discriminate against them?)… international vaccination certificates would hold this information, which can be vital for health professionals. And they serve as a practical tool for patients to know exactly their immunisation status in relation to a range of diseases and when boosters might be due.

Leave a Reply